# Systems of Linear Equations

A Linear Equation is an **equation** for a **line**.

A linear equation is not always in the form **y = 3.5 − 0.5x**,

It can also be like **y = 0.5(7 − x)**

Or like **y + 0.5x = 3.5**

Or like **y + 0.5x − 3.5 = 0** and more.

(Note: those are all the same linear equation!)

A **System** of Linear Equations is when we have **two or more linear equations** working together.

### Example: Here are two linear equations:

2x | + | y | = | 5 |

−x | + | y | = | 2 |

Together they are a system of linear equations.

Can you discover the values of **x** and **y** yourself? (Just have a go, play with them a bit.)

Let's try to build and solve a real world example:

### Example: You versus Horse

It's a race!

You can run **0.2 km** every minute.

The Horse can run **0.5 km** every minute. But it takes 6 minutes to saddle the horse.

**How far can you get before the horse catches you?**

We can make **two** equations (**d**=distance in km, **t**=time in minutes)

- You run at 0.2km every minute, so
**d = 0.2t** - The horse runs at 0.5 km per minute, but we take 6 off its time:
**d = 0.5(t−6)**

So we have a **system** of equations (that are **linear**):

**d = 0.2t****d = 0.5(t−6)**

We can solve it on a graph:

Do you see how the horse starts at 6 minutes, but then runs faster?

It seems you get caught after 10 minutes ... you only got 2 km away.

Run faster next time.

So now you know what a System of Linear Equations is.

Let us continue to find out more about them ....

## Solving

**There can be many ways to solve linear equations!**

Let us see another example:

### Example: Solve these two equations:

- x + y = 6
- −3x + y = 2

The two equations are shown on this graph:

Our task is to find where the two lines cross.

Well, we can see where they cross, so it is already solved graphically.

But now let's solve it using Algebra!

Hmmm ... how to solve this? **There can be many ways!** In this case both equations have "y" so let's try subtracting the whole second equation from the first:

Now let us simplify it:

So now we know the lines cross at **x=1**.

And we can find the matching value of **y** using either of the two original equations (because we know they have the same value at x=1). Let's use the first one (you can try the second one yourself):

And the solution is:

x = 1 and y = 5

And the graph shows us we are right!

## Linear Equations

Only simple variables are allowed in linear equations. **No x ^{2}, y^{3}, √x, etc**:

Linear vs non-linear

## Dimensions

A Linear Equation can be in 2 dimensions ...(such as x and y) |
||

... or in 3 dimensions ... (it makes a plane) |
||

... or 4 dimensions ... | ||

... or more! |

## Common Variables

Equations that "work together" share one or more variables:

A System of Equations has **two or more equations** in **one or more variables**

## Many Variables

So a System of Equations could have **many** equations and **many** variables.

### Example: 3 equations in 3 variables

2x | + | y | − | 2z | = | 3 |

x | − | y | − | z | = | 0 |

x | + | y | + | 3z | = | 12 |

There can be any combination:

- 2 equations in 3 variables,
- 6 equations in 4 variables,
- 9,000 equations in 567 variables,
- etc.

## Solutions

When the number of equations is the **same** as the number of variables there is **likely** to be a solution. Not guaranteed, but likely.

In fact there are only three possible cases:

**No**solution**One**solution**Infinitely many**solutions

When there is **no solution** the equations are called **"inconsistent"**.

**One** or ** infinitely many solutions** are called

**"consistent"**

Here is a diagram for **2 equations in 2 variables**:

## Independent

**"Independent"** means that each equation gives new information.

Otherwise they are **"Dependent"**.

Also called "Linear Independence" and "Linear Dependence"

### Example:

- x + y = 3
- 2x + 2y = 6

Those equations are **"Dependent"**, because they are really the **same equation**, just multiplied by 2.

So the second equation gave **no new information**.

## Where the Equations are True

The trick is to find where **all** equations are **true at the same time**.

**True?** What does that mean?

### Example: You versus Horse

The "you" line is **true all along its length** (but nowhere else).

Anywhere on that line **d** is equal to **0.2t**

- at t=5 and d=1, the equation is
**true**(Is d = 0.2t? Yes, as**1 = 0.2×5**is true) - at t=5 and d=3, the equation is
**not**true (Is d = 0.2t? No, as**3 = 0.2×5 is not true**)

Likewise the "horse" line is also **true all along its length** (but nowhere else).

But only at the point where they **cross** (at t=10, d=2) are they **both true**.

So they have to be true ** simultaneously** ...

... that is why some people call them **"Simultaneous Linear Equations"**

## Solve Using Algebra

It is common to use Algebra to solve them.

Here is the "Horse" example solved using Algebra:

### Example: You versus Horse

The system of equations is:

- d = 0.2t
- d = 0.5(t−6)

**In this case** it seems easiest to set them equal to each other:

d = 0.2t = 0.5(t−6)

**0.5(t−6)**:0.2t = 0.5t − 3

**0.5t**from both sides:−0.3t = −3

**−0.3**:t = −3/−0.3 =

**10**minutes

*Now we know when you get caught!*

**t**we can calculate

**d**:d = 0.2t = 0.2×10 =

**2**km

And our solution is:

t = 10 minutes and d = 2 km

## Algebra vs Graphs

Why use Algebra when graphs are so easy? Because:

More than 2 variables can't be solved by a simple graph.

So Algebra comes to the rescue with two popular methods:

- Solving By Substitution
- Solving By Elimination

We will see each one, with examples in 2 variables, and in 3 variables. Here goes ...

## Solving By Substitution

These are the steps:

- Write one of the equations so it is in the style
**"variable = ..."** **Replace**(i.e. substitute) that variable in the other equation(s).**Solve**the other equation(s)- (Repeat as necessary)

Here is an example with **2 equations in 2 variables**:

### Example:

- 3x + 2y = 19
- x + y = 8

We can start with **any equation** and **any variable**.

Let's use the second equation and the variable "y" (it looks the simplest equation).

Write one of the equations so it is in the style "variable = ...":

We can subtract x from both sides of x + y = 8 to get **y = 8 − x**. Now our equations look like this:

- 3x + 2y = 19
**y = 8 − x**

Now replace "y" with "8 − x" in the other equation:

- 3x + 2
**(8 − x)**= 19 - y = 8 − x

Solve using the usual algebra methods:

Expand **2(8−x)**:

- 3x +
**16 − 2x**= 19 - y = 8 − x

Then **3x−2x = x**:

**x**+ 16 = 19- y = 8 − x

And lastly **19−16=3**

**x = 3**- y = 8 − x

Now we know what **x** is, we can put it in the **y = 8 − x** equation:

- x = 3
- y = 8
**− 3**= 5

And the answer is:

x = 3

y = 5

*Note: because there is a solution the equations are "consistent"*

Check: why don't you check to see if x = 3 and y = 5 works in both equations?

## Solving By Substitution: 3 equations in 3 variables

OK! Let's move to a **longer** example: **3 equations in 3 variables**.

*This is not hard to do... it just takes a long time!*

### Example:

- x + z = 6
- z − 3y = 7
- 2x + y + 3z = 15

We should line up the variables neatly, or we may lose track of what we are doing:

x | + | z | = | 6 | |||||

− | 3y | + | z | = | 7 | ||||

2x | + | y | + | 3z | = | 15 |

We can start with any equation and any variable. Let's use the first equation and the variable "x".

Write one of the equations so it is in the style "variable = ...":

x |
= |
6 − z |
|||||||

− | 3y | + | z | = | 7 | ||||

2x | + | y | + | 3z | = | 15 |

Now replace "x" with "6 − z" in the other equations:

(Luckily there is only one other equation with x in it)

x | = | 6 − z | ||||||||

− | 3y | + | z | = | 7 | |||||

2(6−z) |
+ | y | + | 3z | = | 15 |

Solve using the usual algebra methods:

**2(6−z) + y + 3z = 15** simplifies to **y + z = 3**:

x | = | 6 − z | |||||||

− | 3y | + | z | = | 7 | ||||

y | + | z | = | 3 |

Good. We have made some progress, but not there yet.

Now **repeat the process**, but just for the last 2 equations.

Write one of the equations so it is in the style "variable = ...":

Let's choose the last equation and the variable z:

x | = | 6 − z | |||||||

− | 3y | + | z | = | 7 | ||||

z |
= |
3 − y |

Now replace "z" with "3 − y" in the other equation:

x | = | 6 − z | |||||||

− | 3y | + | 3 − y |
= | 7 | ||||

z | = | 3 − y |

Solve using the usual algebra methods:

**−3y + (3−y) = 7** simplifies to **−4y = 4**, or in other words **y = −1**

x | = | 6 − z | |||||||

y |
= |
−1 |
|||||||

z | = | 3 − y |

Almost Done!

Knowing that **y = −1** we can calculate that **z = 3−y = 4**:

x | = | 6 − z | |||||||

y | = | −1 | |||||||

z |
= |
4 |

And knowing that **z = 4** we can calculate that **x = 6−z = 2**:

x |
= |
2 |
|||||||

y | = | −1 | |||||||

z | = | 4 |

And the answer is:

x = 2

y = −1

z = 4

Check: please check this yourself.

We can use this method for 4 or more equations and variables... just do the same steps again and again until it is solved.

Conclusion: Substitution works nicely, but does take a long time to do.

## Solving By Elimination

Elimination can be faster ... but needs to be kept neat.

"Eliminate" means to **remove**: this method works by removing variables until there is just one left.

The idea is that we **can safely**:

**multiply**an equation by a constant (except zero),**add**(or subtract) an equation on to another equation

Like in these two examples:

### CAN we safely add equations to each other?

Yes, because we are "keeping the balance".

Imagine two really simple equations:

x − 5 = 3

5 = 5

We can add the "5 = 5" to "x − 5 = 3":

x − 5 + 5 = 3 + 5

x = 8

Try that yourself but use 5 = 3+2 as the 2nd equation

It works just fine, because both sides are equal (that is what the = is for)

We can also swap equations around, so the 1st could become the 2nd, etc, if that helps.

OK, time for a full example. Let's use the **2 equations in 2 variables** example from before:

### Example:

- 3x + 2y = 19
- x + y = 8

**Very** important to keep things neat:

3x | + | 2y | = | 19 | |||

x | + | y | = | 8 |

Now ... our aim is to **eliminate** a variable from an equation.

First we see there is a "2y" and a "y", so let's work on that.

**Multiply** the second equation by 2:

3x | + | 2y | = | 19 | |||

2x |
+ | 2y |
= | 16 |

**Subtract** the second equation from the first equation:

x |
= |
3 |
|||||

2x | + | 2y | = | 16 |

**Yay! Now we know what x is!**

Next we see the 2nd equation has "2x", so let's halve it, and then subtract "x":

**Multiply** the second equation by **½** (i.e. divide by 2):

x | = | 3 | |||||

x |
+ |
y |
= |
8 |

**Subtract** the first equation from the second equation:

x | = | 3 | |||||

y |
= |
5 |

**Done!**

And the answer is:

x = 3 and y = 5

And here is the graph:

The blue line is where **3x + 2y = 19** is true

The red line is where **x + y = 8** is true

At x=3, y=5 (where the lines cross) they are **both** true. **That** is the answer.

Here is another example:

### Example:

- 2x − y = 4
- 6x − 3y = 3

Lay it out neatly:

2x | − | y | = | 4 | |||

6x | − | 3y | = | 3 |

**Multiply** the first equation by 3:

6x |
− | 3y |
= |
12 |
|||

6x | − | 3y | = | 3 |

**Subtract** the second equation from the first equation:

0 |
− | 0 |
= |
9 |
|||

6x | − | 3y | = | 3 |

0 − 0 = 9 ???

**What is going on here?**

Quite simply, there is no solution.

They are actually parallel lines: |

And lastly:

### Example:

- 2x − y = 4
- 6x − 3y = 12

Neatly:

2x | − | y | = | 4 | |||

6x | − | 3y | = | 12 |

**Multiply** the first equation by 3:

6x |
− | 3y |
= |
12 |
|||

6x | − | 3y | = | 12 |

**Subtract** the second equation from the first equation:

0 |
− | 0 |
= |
0 |
|||

6x | − | 3y | = | 3 |

0 − 0 = 0

**Well, that is actually TRUE! Zero does equal zero ...**

... that is because they are really the same equation ...

... so there are an Infinite Number of Solutions

They are the same line: |

And so now we have seen an example of each of the three possible cases:

**No**solution**One**solution**Infinitely many**solutions

## Solving By Elimination: 3 equations in 3 variables

Before we start on the next example, let's look at an improved way to do things.

Follow this method and we are less likely to make a mistake.

First of all, eliminate the variables **in order**:

- Eliminate
**x**s first (from equation 2 and 3, in order) - then eliminate
**y**(from equation 3)

Start with:

Eliminate in this order:

We then have this "triangle shape":

Now start at the bottom and **work back up** (called "Back-Substitution")

(put in** z** to find **y**, then **z** and** y** to find **x**):

And we are solved:

ALSO, it is easier to do **some** of the calculations in our head, or on scratch paper, instead of always working within the set of equations:

### Example:

- x + y + z = 6
- 2y + 5z = −4
- 2x + 5y − z = 27

Written neatly:

x | + | y | + | z | = | 6 | |||

2y | + | 5z | = | −4 | |||||

2x | + | 5y | − | z | = | 27 |

First, eliminate **x** from 2nd and 3rd equation.

There is no x in the 2nd equation ... move on to the 3rd equation:

**Subtract 2 times the 1st equation from the 3rd equation** (just do this in your head or on scratch paper):

And we get:

x | + | y | + | z | = | 6 | |||

2y | + | 5z | = | −4 | |||||

3y |
− | 3z |
= |
15 |

Next, eliminate **y** from 3rd equation.

We **could** subtract 1½ times the 2nd equation from the 3rd equation (because 1½ times 2 is 3) ...

... but we can **avoid fractions** if we:

- multiply the 3rd equation by
**2**and - multiply the 2nd equation by
**3**

and *then* do the subtraction ... like this:

And we end up with:

x | + | y | + | z | = | 6 | |||

2y | + | 5z | = | −4 | |||||

z |
= |
−2 |

We now have that "triangle shape"!

Now go back up again "back-substituting":

We know **z**, so **2y+5z=−4** becomes **2y−10=−4**, then** 2y=6**, so **y=3**:

x | + | y | + | z | = | 6 | |||

y |
= |
3 |
|||||||

z | = | −2 |

Then **x+y+z=6** becomes **x+3−2=6**, so **x=6−3+2=5**

x |
= |
5 |
|||||||

y | = | 3 | |||||||

z | = | −2 |

And the answer is:

x = 5

y = 3

z = −2

Please check this for yourself, it is good practice.

## General Advice

Once you get used to the Elimination Method it becomes easier than Substitution, because you just follow the steps and the answers appear.

But sometimes Substitution can give a quicker result.

- Substitution is often easier for small cases (like 2 equations, or sometimes 3 equations)
- Elimination is easier for larger cases

And it always pays to look over the equations first, to see if there is an easy shortcut ... so experience helps ... so get experience!